Home Tags Posts tagged with "The Judiciary"
Tag:

The Judiciary

Business

How EADB and Judiciary Colluded to Silence Raphael Tuju

by Daily Trends
written by Daily Trends

The East African Development Bank (EADB) has crossed a dangerous line. After years of bulldozing Raphael Tuju in a legal dispute over a 27-acre land in Karen, the bank has now resorted to writing press releases for the Judiciary.

This comes after EADB suffered a major legal blow—losing its immunity from prosecution. Instead of accepting the ruling, the bank has gone into full-blown damage control, launching a desperate smear campaign and spending a staggering $3 million through Ogilvy PR to suppress negative coverage.

Judiciary and EADB Issue Identical Statements

Hours after the Judiciary released a media brief warning the press against covering Tuju’s dispute with EADB, the bank issued an almost identical statement.

The wording left no doubt—EADB had drafted the statement, and the Judiciary merely signed off on it.

This is not just unethical. It is a blatant display of collusion between a financial entity and the very body meant to uphold justice. The Kenyan public has every reason to be outraged.

A Direct Attack on Media Freedom

EADB did not stop at manipulating the Judiciary. The bank went further, warning the media against reporting on its conduct.

“This notwithstanding, the Bank urges the Fourth Estate to exercise its duty to objectivity—the bedrock upon which the profession is founded—by counterchecking claims made on the Bank’s operations against available facts, which we are ready to offer whenever requested,” read the statement.

The Judiciary echoed the same message

“We also call on the media to verify facts before reporting on such matters to avoid contributing to misinformation or disinformation,” said Judiciary spokesperson Paul Ndemo.

Since when did the Judiciary become the mouthpiece of a bank? Who exactly is pulling the strings?

The Judiciary’s involvement in this PR game raises serious questions about its credibility and independence. How can Kenyans trust a court system that is openly coordinating with a bank to control narratives?

EADB’s Fear of Public Scrutiny

EADB is in full panic mode. Tuju has gained the upper hand both in court and in public opinion. Instead of facing accountability, the bank is resorting to threats, PR gimmicks, and behind-the-scenes deals with the Judiciary.

What is EADB so afraid of?

If the bank has nothing to hide, why is it spending millions to control the narrative?

Why is the Judiciary taking sides in a private legal dispute?

Who stands to benefit from silencing Tuju?

A History of Battles Over His Properties

This is not the first time Tuju has had to fight for his properties against what he calls corporate-backed fraud and judicial corruption. Over the years, he has accused banks, lawyers, and auctioneers of orchestrating schemes to rob him of his assets.

The Karen Land Dispute – Tuju has been embroiled in a battle with EADB over the 27-acre land in Karen, which he insists was illegally targeted in a fraudulent loan deal.

The Sh4.5 Billion Loan Scam – Tuju has maintained that false affidavits and backroom dealings were used to manipulate a case against him, pushing him to the brink of losing property worth billions.

Lawyers and Judges in Collusion – He has called out Senior Counsels Githu Muigai and Fred Ojiambo for their role in cases that allegedly sought to dispossess him of his assets.

This pattern of abuse is not unique to Tuju. Many Kenyans have lost their properties to powerful individuals who manipulate the court system for personal gain.

Tuju Takes the Fight to Court

Today, Raphael Tuju will be in court alongside Senior Counsels Nelson Havi and Ahmednassir Abdullahi. The legal team is set to challenge the Supreme Court’s handling of the case and expose the Judiciary’s compromised position.

This is no longer just a land dispute. It is a fight against judicial overreach, corporate influence, and blatant abuse of power.

Kenya’s Judiciary is in crisis. The question is—who will hold it accountable?

EADB’s attempt to shut down media coverage will not work. The truth is already out, and Kenyans are watching. This case will be a defining moment in the fight against judicial corruption and corporate impunity.

Will justice prevail, or will powerful institutions continue to manipulate the system for their benefit? The country awaits the outcome.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
Justice Grace Nzioka
Latest News

Lady Justice Grace Nzioka Biography: Education, Career, Husband

by Mustafa Juma
written by Mustafa Juma
  • Born into relative obscurity, Nzioka’s journey to becoming a respected jurist was marked by her dedication, intellect, and commitment to upholding the principles of justice.
  • Lady Justice Nzioka found herself thrust into the limelight when she presided over the murder case that captured the nation’s attention for six long years.
  • Beyond her role in the courtroom, Justice Nzioka has been an advocate for the rights of the disadvantaged in society.

Lady Justice Grace Nzioka emerged as a prominent figure in the judicial landscape of Kenya, particularly gaining attention during the high-profile murder case involving businesswoman Monica Kimani, former Citizen TV news anchor Jacque Maribe, and Joseph Irungu alias Jowie.

Born into relative obscurity, Nzioka’s journey to becoming a respected jurist was marked by her dedication, intellect, and commitment to upholding the principles of justice.

Lady Justice Grace Nzioka’s Career

While specific details about Lady Justice Grace Nzioka’s early life and upbringing remain private, her legal career showcased a remarkable trajectory.

Graduating with top honors from a prestigious law school, Nzioka quickly gained recognition for her sharp legal acumen and dedication to the pursuit of justice.

Lady Justice Grace Nzioka. Photo/Courtesy

Lady Justice Nzioka found herself thrust into the limelight when she presided over the murder case that captured the nation’s attention for six long years.

The trial involved Jacque Maribe and Joseph Irungu, with the former facing serious charges related to the tragic death of Monica Kimani.

Throughout the legal proceedings, Nzioka demonstrated a profound understanding of the law, earning widespread admiration for her poise, eloquence, and meticulous analysis of the evidence presented.

Her assurance that she had thoroughly examined all submissions and evidence, coupled with the declaration that she could read the judgment for six hours without a paper in her hand, showcased her unwavering commitment to ensuring a fair and just outcome.

Nzioka’s reading of the judgment became a focal point for observers, both in the courtroom and online.

Kenyans praised her for her articulate nature, composed demeanor, and the clarity with which she presented the complex legal aspects of the case. Social media buzzed with compliments, with many expressing their admiration for her captivating style.

Her involvement in high-profile cases, such as the Ksh1.5 billion case involving former Cabinet Secretary Raphael Tuju, showcased her dedication to justice.

In a display of integrity, she recused herself from the Tuju case, citing an inability to proceed and directing that the matter be mentioned before the presiding judge of the Commercial Division.

Lady Justice Grace Nzioka. Photo/Courtesy.

Beyond her role in the courtroom, Justice Nzioka has been an advocate for the rights of the disadvantaged in society.

In November 2023, she emphasized the need for a child protection unit at various stations to address the backlog of minor cases.

Acknowledging the significant workload, she highlighted that the Judiciary was actively working to reduce the backlog, demonstrating her commitment to ensuring justice for all, especially the most vulnerable in society.

In September 2022, Chief Justice Martha Koome made changes, relocating Justice Nzioka from Nairobi to the High Court in Naivasha.

Lady Justice Grace Nzioka’s Husband

Lady Justice Grace Nzioka is married to Mr. Jeremiah Kyeva.

Lady Justice Grace Nzioka’s husband is a brother to Prof Gideon Nyamasyo, a retired environmental department lecturer at the University of Nairobi.

In 2014, Prof Nyamasyo made headlines after he teamed up with his brother Mr. Kyeva who is Justice Grace Nzioka’s husband, Ms Agnes Jessie Mueni, a retired diplomat, and Ms Evelyn Mwikali, a teacher, in suing their 86-year-old mother, Ms Dorcas Katumbi Ernest over the estate of their late father.

Robbery Victim

In 2013, the judge experienced a harrowing incident when she became the victim of a robbery and kidnapping at her Karen home in Nairobi.

The unfortunate event unfolded as Justice Nzioka was driving into her compound. Five armed men confronted her, leading to her abduction.

The assailants forced their way into her house, where they stole various items, including documents, a laptop, a television set, and other electronics.

Naivasha High Court judge Grace Nzioka on a supervisory visit at Engineer Law Court. Photo/Courtesy/The Judiciary.

During the ordeal, Justice Nzioka and her husband were taken hostage, and the armed men drove them to the Dagoretti area, withdrawing over Ksh40,000 from their ATM accounts.

Ultimately, the judge and her husband were abandoned in the Kangemi area. The incident raised questions about the judge’s security, as it was revealed that her bodyguards were unarmed at the time.

Investigators sought to determine the motive behind the attack and whether it was connected to her work.

At that time, Justice Nzioka chaired a commission investigating the Tana River clashes, a significant and sensitive matter that had claimed numerous lives and displaced thousands of people.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
President William Ruto meeting with Chief Justice Martha Koome
Politics

DETAILS: What Ruto, CJ Koome Agreed During The State House Meeting

by Mustafa Juma
written by Mustafa Juma

State House Spokesperson Hussein Mohamed has revealed the details of the Monday morning meeting between President William Ruto, Chief Justice Martha Koome and National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetang’ula.

Hussein in a statement shared via his official X account said President Ruto had convened the leadership meeting of the Executive, Legislature and the Judiciary, at the request of the Judiciary.

The meeting aimed at deliberating on building approaches to fight corruption, enhance accountability and to facilitate the efficient and seamless delivery of services to the people of Kenya.

The Executive, Judiciary and Legislature have agreed to each submit, within 30 days, proposals on fighting corruption, improving service delivery and enhancing institutional accountability to a forum of the National Council of the Administration of Justice convened by the Chief Justice.

To optimize the efficient service delivery and the fight against corruption, the Executive and legislature will support the Judiciary’s request for additional budgetry.

Below is the full statement on the deliberations of the meeting.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
Politics

President Ruto’s “Mambo ni Matatu” Threat Against The Judiciary Sets The Internet Ablaze

by Daily Trends
written by Daily Trends

President William Ruto has intensified his battle against corruption within the Judiciary, and his latest statement has raised eyebrows and ignited a fresh wave of discussions.

The head of state through his official social media accounts on Thursday, January 4, reiterated his stand against the Judiciary, warning that impunity of bribing judges so as to derail, delay, or sabotage Kenya’s imminent transformation will never happen under his watch.

In his statement, President Ruto noted that flamboyant lawyer Ahmednasir Abdullahi had previously warned him of sabotage by corrupt judicial officers.

The first in command further says that he assured the senior counsel that there are many good officers in the judiciary and that his administration will root out the corrupt.

In what looks like a threat against the judicial officers, President Ruto went ahead to quote his famous phrase of “Mambo ni Matatu..waende jela, wahame Kenya ama waende mbinguni”.

“Ahmednasir SC ,you warned me of sabotage by corrupt judicial officers. I told you there are many good officers in the judiciary and that we will root out the corrupt. We shall. Muite SC, the impunity of bribing judges so as not to derail, delay, or sabotage Kenya’s imminent transformation will never happen under my watch. Not a single cent will be used to bribe nobody. Mambo ya wafisadi wote ni yale nilisema…..,” President Ruto posed.

The president’s post has stirred mixed reactions, with a section of netizens faulting him for the stand.

Some have argued that the move is meant to silence the Judiciary, with others saying commenting that it might cost him the 2027 presidency.

“So corruption is only corruption when it doesn’t favour you? What have you done with the parliament zakayo,” one of the X users posed.

“Wish you used the same energy to hold to account Kimwarer dam culprits. 63B of taxpayers money went down the drain. According to you, Judges are well meaning when they vindicate your cronies. Double standards!” another X user reacted.

President Ruto sparked the conversation when he remarked that the judiciary was being bribed by a few individuals to sabotage his projects.

While making reference to the court order that stopped the housing levy, the head of state said his administration will start disobeying such orders that are aimed at derailing his work.

This attracted condemnation from different sects, among them the Law Society of Kenya, the Kenya judges and magistrates associations, Chief Justice Martha Koome and a section of politicians.

LSK on Wednesday threatened to stage national protests to force President Ruto to withdraw his remarks against the Judiciary, but the head of state seem snot to be letting go of the war any time soon. Or is he?

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
Politics

Ruto, Judiciary War Escalates as State House Issues Another Statement

by Mustafa Juma
written by Mustafa Juma

Just hours after the Law Society of Kenya (LSK) urged President William Ruto to take back his remarks on the Judiciary, vowing to take to the streets for peaceful protests next week, State House has issued a statement telling off the lawyers.

In statement issued by State House spokesperson Hussein Mohamed, President Ruto has told off LSK for criticising and attempting to advise the President on the independence of the Judiciary and Constitutionalism.

According to the statement, President Ruto’s push for judicial reforms is unstoppable.

State House intimated that the advice by LSK was not necessary as the President has consistently upheld the rule of law and respected court orders, even in regards to his affordable housing pet project.

“We, however, agree with the Law Society of Kenya that Executive impunity is unacceptable. However, legislative impunity, by its own measure, is also unacceptable and so is judicial impunity,” reads the statement in part.

According to the State House Spokesperson, it would be a dereliction of the President’s oath of office, and a betrayal of the people’s mandate to allow their hopes and aspirations to be obstructed by corruption and impunity.

LSK had earlier on announced that it will organize peaceful protests across the country in defense of the rule of law and in solidarity with the Judiciary.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, January 3, LSK President Eric Theuri accused the President of undermining the rule of law and the independence of the Judiciary, which he said was “a cornerstone of democracy.”

Moments later, Chief Justice Martha Koome called out perceived judicial intimidation by the Executive and urged judges and judicial officials to carry on with their work without fear of reproach or coercion. 

It all started when President Ruto, while speaking in Nyandarua on Tuesday, claimed that the the Judiciary harbours rogue elements out to sabotage his legacy.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
Politics

Miguna Miguna Reveals Worrying Details Amid Ruto, Judiciary War

by Daily Trends
written by Daily Trends

Lawyer Miguna Miguna has revealed worrying details amid a war between President William Ruto and the Judiciary.

President Ruto caused an uproar after making remarks against the Judiciary.

The head of state while speaking in Nyandarua on Tuesday, January 2, alleged that some rulings made by the Judiciary were slowing down the implementation of the Kenya Kwanza development agenda.

One of the rulings that provoked the President’s ire was the court order that halted the implementation of the 1.5 per cent housing levy on salaried Kenyans, declaring it unconstitutional.

President Ruto claimed that the court order was a setback to his administration’s efforts to provide affordable housing to Kenyans, which is one of the pillars of the Kenya Kwanza development agenda, and hinted at disobeying subsequent orders.

This irked a section of Kenyans, with the Law Society of Kenya (LSK) announcing that it will organize peaceful protests across the country in defense of the rule of law and in solidarity with the Judiciary.

LSK has also urged its members to wear purple ribbons throughout the next week as a symbol of protest against the President’s threats to defy court orders, which it termed as a “constitutional coup” and a “return of an autocratic regime.”

However, the State House in a quick rejoinder affirmed that President Ruto’s push for judicial reforms is unstoppable, telling off the LSK for criticising and attempting to advise the Head of State on the independence of the Judiciary and Constitutionalism.

In a subsequent statement by Spokesperson Hussein Mohamed, State House intimated that the advice by LSK was not necessary as the President has consistently upheld the rule of law and respected court orders, even in regards to his affordable housing pet project.

The State House response prompted Miguna Miguna to take to his official social media accounts to reveal details that should worry Kenyans.

According to Miguna Miguna, this is just but the beginning of dictatorship in the country.

Miguna says dictatorship starts when the country is hungry, exhausted and desperate.

He goes ahead to note that the dictatorship starts by killing organized institutions and spaces that would protect the people against excesses by those in power.

“This is how dictatorship starts. It creeps in when the country is hungry, exhausted and desperate. It starts by killing organized institutions and spaces that would protect the people against excesses by those in power.

“We cannot allow anyone to turn the judiciary into a scared, threatened and bludgeoned institution because that cannot be in the interest of the people. We need a strong, INDEPENDENT, competent and ETHICAL judiciary. We cannot build one through executive threats, intimidation, coercion, or bribery!” Miguna posted.

In a separate statement, the JSC had also expressed concern over the public criticism and vilification of judges and judicial officers for issuing court orders that are perceived to be against state programmes and policies.

 JSC reaffirmed the independence and integrity of the judiciary as “a co-equal arm of government”, as enshrined in the constitution, and urged all judges and judicial officers to continue performing their judicial duties “without fear or favour”.

0 comment
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedinTumblrWhatsappTelegramEmail
Load More Posts